I really would like
to think that my holiday spirit today is what it was nearly nine years
ago. Alas, some of the magic has
undoubtedly gone away. At nineteen, it
seems hard for me and just about everyone else my age to believe that we’ll be
hearing from jolly old St. Nick any time soon.
However, I don’t think that it really matters what kind of character you
are around Christmastime, for the most wonderful time of the year brings out
something great in all of us. At least,
that’s the feeling I get when I delve into my past by watching films like The Polar Express.
This was one of
those films that had me stopping and staring when I saw a movie poster
advertising it several months in advance.
This is because the book by Chris Van Allsburg was one of the first
books I learned to read by myself. I
think I was immediately drawn to such a plotline through a combination of my
love of Christmas and my love of railroad history. In my eyes, few things are more majestic than
a classic steam train, and I think a lot of young children feel the same way. Even at nineteen, the image of that iron
horse emerging through the snowy night still gives me a feeling that I am
witness to something epic. Ultimately
though, this time I have a slightly different purpose for which to get on
board. Now I have analyzed this film to
see what else it tells those children, and I think it says a lot more than
meets the eight-year old eye. With its
G-rating, there are few instances in which one might find a message that we
would rather not communicate to the five-to-ten year old part of our society,
but that does not mean that this is simply some feel-good story about the
dominant holiday in this country. No, this
is not just about Christmas and the legend of Santa Claus. This is about values that we are supposed to
cherish throughout our entire lives.
Through a unique blend of ethos, pathos, and logos, this film teaches us
a few things that, even at my age, I really should make note of for a long time
to come.
The appeal that
seems to appear the least often, yet stand out the most profoundly, is that of
ethos. The producers of this film
undoubtedly wanted to ensure that no child of any kind felt excluded from the
movie. In my book, they succeeded in
just about every way. There are not a
lot of children depicted aboard the Polar Express, but within the tight-knit
group that was, there were children of all shapes and sizes. Our main character, who has no name, climbs
aboard and sits between a quiet, compassionate girl of African-American descent
and a prototypical nerd who is not afraid to flaunt his knowledge, albeit to
his own detriment. Then there’s the kid
who sits alone at the back of the train.
Billy, who is the only child aboard the train to be explicitly named, is
from a poor, rural area, and we seem to understand from the start that he is a
lot like our main character in that they both have some doubts about the
existence of Santa Claus. They haven’t
given up on him yet, they just have come to think that “seeing is believing.” Nowadays, I realize that Billy represents
something much more than just another kid who needs a friend. He tells us later on in the movie during the
song “When Christmas Comes to Town” how he feels about Christmas, which has
rarely if ever amounted to a happy holiday for him. Now, this movie will undoubtedly be seen by
countless kids who might not receive anything for a certain Christmas, or even
any Christmas. This is for them, an
appeal that recognizes the situation of so many. This character lets us know that Santa Claus
cares about each and every one of us equally, even if he doesn’t always make an
appearance. That is, just because you
are underprivileged in some way does not make you inferior and it is no excuse
to lose the spirit of Christmas.
There is another
very profound appeal to ethos present as far as the characters are
concerned. This one involves those who
give our main character the most direct advice on what he is supposed to
believe and why. The train’s conductor
might have a bit of a short temper, but he is undoubtedly benevolent to
everyone on board the train, as evidenced by the advice he gives to our core
group of characters and the attention he pays to their well-being aboard the
train. His way of giving advice to our
hero is by giving him a series of choices to make, starting with whether or not
to get on the train. While it seems a
bit in poor taste at first, eventually this old softie of a man wins us over
completely. On the other hand, the old
hobo that our hero meets on top of the train is an interesting case study. Upon listening to him speak, you can’t help
but ask yourself the questions that we are encouraged to ask by Andrea Lunsford
in Everything’s an Argument: “Can we trust him?” “Do we want to trust him?”
(Lunsford 45). We know two things
relatively quickly: he stands in stark contrast to the conductor and he’s some
sort of ghost who disappears after bailing the central characters out of
dangerous situations at various points. This
latter fact might allow us to believe that we can trust him, as this allows us
to determine that he is for the main character.
But the man’s gruff speech and general distaste for life seem to provide
him with a somewhat subpar ethos to start with, so we might not necessarily
want to trust him. Eventually, he starts
to confront the main character’s personal doubts directly by labeling him
things like “doubter” and “scrooge” and doing so in menacing ways. He sounds like the devil’s advocate in doing
so, but ultimately this teaches our hero to confront his own doubtful nature
directly and aggressively in turn. The
moral here is a bit difficult to figure out.
I think that it says that you can’t judge a person simply based on what
they look like or what they’ve been through.
This poor man scares us in a lot of ways, but he plays an integral role
in the transformation of our main character from doubter to believer. Ethos is not set in stone once
established. Rather, it is constantly
changing for every person in some shape or form that is not always easily seen.
As with any
children’s movie, the appeal that probably sticks in the minds of these youths
for the longest time is that to pathos. It
was no different for me nine years ago, although I will admit that the scenes
that evoked the most emotion in me were probably slightly different from those
of my comrades. As I said earlier, just
seeing a 2-8-4 Baldwin locomotive at full throttle was enough to give me the
chills. As far as the images and sounds
of this film are concerned, this movie was part of the dawning of a new era in
animation. No longer would the vast
majority of children’s movies be cartoonish and very two-dimensional animated
films. Four years into the twenty-first
century, the golden age of the animated children’s movie (at least to us
children of the 1990s) appears to have ended.
At age nineteen, I can see that The
Polar Express has its flaws. Some
concepts of motion appear just a touch off from realistic and occasionally
speech patterns do not match up exactly with the audio, a trait that could be
covered for easily in earlier animated films. At age eleven, though, I was oblivious to
these facts. In fact, it looked as real
as could be to me at that point and the emotion that it evoked in me stayed
with me for some time after seeing the film.
Today, when I think of this movie, what immediately comes to mind for me
is the scene that takes place as the train is circling the sheer mountain and
the conductor is talking to the two main characters about real things we don’t
need to see to believe. Then they climb
down into the first car on the train and the dream briefly turns into a
nightmare. The color seemingly drains
from the picture as the central characters examine piles of toys that had been
neglected and were being recycled. This
was a haunting image the first time I saw it, but looking back on this film,
I’ve noticed two new things about this scene.
Having things appear to turn a shade of gray is a technique designed to
make things appear tainted or hopeless, something that Louis D. Giannetti
hinted at in Understanding Movies. He gave two examples of scenes in movies that
saw once vibrant colors fade to a sickly shade as the situation became ever
direr for those involved (Giannetti 25).
I did not think that such a technique could be applied to animation, but
this group of producers somehow pulled it off. The effect still was as profound nine years
later, but my reaction this time was significantly different to my original
one. The first sentence that came to
mind was, “You’re going to cry over damaged toys when such neglect happens to
people?” Granted, young moviegoers
always take such a side, but this is treading a fine line that I am not sure
that I would endorse if I was a producer for this film. Whether this is simply an effort to remind
children to take good care of their things or a missed opportunity to make a
larger statement is in the eye of the beholder. Regardless, if this is a potential problem
message in any way, it is not a glaring one, and the list of such occurrences
in this film is not long. I see no significant
issues arising as a result of this film, hence it is deserving of the ’G’
rating. As a whole, the appeals to
pathos present in The Polar Express seem
to be what gives the film its substance.
Emotion plays a large role in children’s movies, and this instance is no
different.
Most of the lessons
emphasized in The Polar Express are
made explicit so that developing minds can process them. However, I noticed a number of messages that
might have flown under the radar for me at age eleven. These are not exactly implicit, but one must
put two and two together in order to properly understand them. Hence, these fall under the category of
appeals to logos. This is a skill that a
ten-year old theater-goer might possess, but a six-year old might not. Two life lessons that are meant to be hinted
at are present very near the beginning of the film. “You shouldn’t believe everything you read”
immediately popped into my head when our main character began looking through
his encyclopedia and the latest magazines, all of which hint at the apparent
certainty that there is no Santa Claus.
The second involves seizing opportunities as our hero faced the decision
of whether or not to get on the train. Having
made the right choice in the beginning, he is faced with numerous small choices
that end up having far-reaching consequences.
Sometimes you need to be proactive and sometimes you have to have to
know your limits. This is a logical
deduction that I made after our main character tried to be the hero on numerous
occasions by trying to return his friend’s ticket. He ends up on a wild ride atop the train
after finding the ticket that he had originally lost by trying to go the extra
mile. The reason he does this is because
the know-it-all in front of him said that the conductor would throw the girl
off the train if she didn’t have a ticket.
This is a ludicrous statement, but just about all the children believe
it. The lesson here is: don’t listen to
rumors and don’t take the word of just anyone; the conductor was not about to
throw her off the train. These are the
kinds of implied messages that we see throughout the film, but just in case the
younger children don’t quite pick up on them, there are more explicit morals
that are brought to the forefront with things like Santa’s personal advice to
each of the primary characters.
All-in-all, there is something for just about everyone to gain, as just
about every possible viewpoint is represented in some way. It all comes down to one’s ability to
interpret the appeals to logos in this film.
“Sometimes seeing
is believing and sometimes the most real things in life are the things we can’t
see.” This quote carries a very powerful
message in my book. The conductor says
this to the two central characters, and he leaves interpreting the meaning of
his words up to them. This is obviously
not only in reference to the legend of Santa Claus, as the topic of
conversation just prior to this quote involves things like spirits and
angels. Then is this some kind of appeal
to religion? It really is not beyond the
realm of possibility that the average eight-year-old might ask the question: Is
believing in Santa Claus really not all that different from believing in
God? People of the Christian faith take
pride in the fact that their faith is not based on sight. In other words, seeing is not believing,
living in blind faith is. Could this
quote be encouraging the youthful viewers to be good children of God? I think it makes an appeal to just about
everyone who has some sort of deity in their lives. Or maybe the intention is the other way
around, as believing in the Lord is not all that different from believing in
Santa Claus. The implications of such
belief are somewhat different, but I am willing to bet that children will pick
up on these things and ask their parents some difficult questions. It is a logical appeal that carries great
meaning, and I believe that it is completely worthwhile. I might not have understood it completely
back in 2004, but regardless, I remembered this quote. I think a lot of other children probably did
as well.
The Polar Express is one of those films
that have stayed with me over the years.
I mean, what better way to celebrate the most wonderful time of the year
than aboard a magic train. Looking back
on it, I now realize that there is so much more to it than met my eleven-year
old eyes. A multitude of appeals to
ethos, pathos, and logos gives this film a degree of depth and quality that I
think are matched by few other children’s movies that I became attached to in
my years growing up. This film looked as
real as could be to me at first, and its initial effects on me were certainly
very real. Regardless as to whether or
not I heeded any of the lessons presented in this film, The Polar Express has always kept a small place in my state of mind
each year at Christmas. I hope it has a
place in the lives of children for years to come. Need I say more? Three tickets...to the North Pole.
No comments:
Post a Comment