Cloverfield directed
by Matt Reeves is a film that uses hand-held video camera footage to
show a group of friends struggle to survive an attack from an unknown
being on New York City. This style of filming has begun to be more and
more popular within recent years, and some other examples are
the Paranormal Activity
installments, Chronicle, and
Project X. This type of filming
which you can see in the videos I have attached creates a personal
first-person vantage point of all of the action. Now, this
first-person point of view has its advantages and disadvantages. I
think that Cloverfield was
faced with some of these challenges while filming. For example, when
you use the hand-held camera to film it gives the viewer only one
vantage point for an action sequence or scene. There is no other view
of the action and things can be happening off screen that may
actually be worth seeing.
In the scene where the characters are on
the Brooklyn bridge, something is happening in the cars below but it
cannot be seen because the person holding the camera is above all of
the action. Then all of a sudden this large tentacle or arm slams the
bridge causing a collapse and the viewer is left confused. The visual
effects of this scene are heavily computer generated and pretty
suspect, but on the other hand, the audio effects of the bridge
collapsing is very appealing. You can really hear the snapping of the
cables and crumbling of the concrete and that helps the scene's believability. Also, the shakiness of the camera
creates a certain level of anxiety and mass confusion that hinders
the actual action occurring in the background. Another scene that I
have attached is when the group is making their way down the street
and they encounter the monster close up for the first time. This
scene is very action-packed and involves fire, explosions, and even
military firearms and weaponry. The special effects in this scene seem pretty realistic, especially when the soldiers are
firing their weapons, but unfortunately since it is all filmed from the
hand-held camera, a lot of the action is missed. This is another
example of how the filming of the movie takes away from the actual
action.
As the viewer you almost get a headache from all of the
movement and change of focus created by the camera. Because all of
these large explosions are computer generated, the physical
acting involved in these scenes are affected as well. Some of the
movements of the actors are a little out of sync with the explosions,
and sometimes they are heavily over-exaggerated. All of these obstacles come with the territory when filming from the first-person perspective. I think that in this movie the disadvantages really outweighed the advantages of filming in this new style, and the constant movement of the camera takes away from the actual action scenes of the movie. The director tried to make this movie seem too real, and by doing so he really hindered the viewing experience. Although the plot line of the movie is not bad, the combination of shaky camera movements and the below average acting and special effects make this movie hard to really enjoy. Because of this I give it two out of five slurpees.
No comments:
Post a Comment