Scooby Doo is a
beloved children’s cartoon which has been airing on television shows for
twenty-four seasons. It involves following a gang of mystery solvers, which
involves the characters Velma, Shaggy, Daphne, Fred, and a dog named Scooby
Doo. In 2002, this cartoon show jumped to the big screen. A movie based off the
series was created. However, instead of
being a cartoon, this film was going to be a live adaption of the show. As an
eleven your old fan of the series, I was excited to go to a theater to see the
movie. Unfortunately, the special effects used to create the character Scooby
Doo were so atrocious that it hindered my experience as a viewer.
For the
live adaption of Scooby Doo, special
effects were going to be relied upon to create the character of Scooby Doo. To
fit in with the live human actors, relying on hand drawn traditional animation
could not work for the film as it did for the cartoon. Instead, it would need
to be created by computers, “which produce images that are created digitally”
(Giannetti 33). The goal of creating such an animation is to make it appear as
close to a realistic dog as possible. The end result, however, had no such
luck. Scooby looked so forged that it appeared he belonged in a movie like Shrek. This took away from the
credibility of Scooby’s character. Credibility is key to allow audiences to
trust and validate what they are viewing (Lunsford 42). As a viewer, it was hard to take any scene with
Scooby seriously. He could not blend in with the rest of the live cast. The
film was asking the audience to make a large willing suspension of disbelief to
get past the poor animation. Seeing as Scooby is a major role in the film, the
end result was a loss of sincerity for the entire film.
The
character of Scooby Doo is one of the most recognizable and loved icons in the
United States. His voice and call of “Scooby dooby doo” is identifiable by
almost all. However, the poor special effects which created his character in
the film did not only cost this role its credibility, but the likability of
Scooby Doo as well. It was almost annoying to watch Scooby as a clear digital
animation wondering around with the actors. This inability to fall in love with
Scooby Doo due to his unrealistic nature was a huge hindrance to my viewing
experience. Here was a character that I had watched for years. Before, however,
he had been a cartoon in a cartoon setting. Scooby was not distracting because he
blended in with the other characters. As a digital simulation, his character
was impossible to like because of the distraction he caused in every scene.
The
special effects used in the film Scooby
Doo ruined the entire movie. It was distracting from the plot line and the
other characters. It created a lack of credibility for the entire film, and the
animation caused it to be impossible to like one of history’s most lovable characters. Scooby Doo’s special effects
earn 1 out of 3 tickets.
Make me watch Scooby doo even today, would happily get a tub of popcorn and start with it. There is a lot of difference between the shows then and now. My kids haven’t even started watching old ones and this post reminds me that. Once their Andy Yeatman shows are over, will still have something entertaining and knowledgeable to show them.
ReplyDelete