(PLEASE
ENJOY THIS CLIP BEFORE READING) http://www.imdb.com/video/hulu/vi1304494105/
If you’re not a fashionista, after watching the clip above from Devil Wears Prada, you may not have
noticed all the brands of coats and bags that were placed on the receptionist’s
desk. Since this is a film about one of New York’s largest fashion magazines, it
is logical to be bombarded with hundreds of product placements in the form of
fashion brands and designer labels. In The
Duds of 'The Devil Wears Prada', author Ruth La Ferla refers to the coat
montage scene and the film’s stylist Patricia Fields. She writes, “They are just the beginning of a
brazen outpouring of $12,000 handbags, $30,000 furs and $1,000 over-the-knee
boots assembled by Ms. Field with a budget of $100,000 and a little help from
designers and friends who, she said, provided access to about $1 million worth
of clothes” (Ferla par. 17). ONE MILLION DOLLARS!!! This is
reportedly one of the highest wardrobe budgets ever. I could probably talk for
days about all of the products within this one film. However, today I will
focus on one product placement, and tell you how they have used this product to
appeal to logos, ethos, and pathos.
There
is a scene early on in the film where the cut-throat Editor-in-Chief, Miranda,
is on her way to the office, and you watch as the entire staff scurry to look
presentable before she arrives. During that time you see a woman running
quickly to switch her frumpy clogs for some stylish high heels. The angle of
the camera allows the audience to see the label “D&G” inside the sole.
D&G stands for the well-known fashion designers Dolce and Gabbana. To start
off my analysis of this product placement, I first wanted to see who D&G’s target
clientele is. On the Dolce and Gabbana website they describe, “the Dolce &
Gabbana woman is strong: she likes herself and knows she is liked…She always
wears very high heels which, in any case, give her both an extremely feminine
and sexy way of walking and unmistakable posture” (par. 3). Wait a second…”always
wear very high heels???” This woman clearly would rather wear something more
comfortable when she isn’t trying to impress anyone. This scene does not appeal
to the company’s ethos. D&G believes that their type of woman is always in
their high heels, and definitely looking sexy. I’m sure I’m not alone when I say
there is nothing sexy about those clogs. The audience also can logically gather
that these high heels are uncomfortable; therefore, she only wears them when
absolutely necessary. If I were D&G, I would not be happy about the way
their product was portrayed in this scene.
The
D&G product placement was not all bad publicity though. You could look at
the label in the shoes and start to feel envy towards the woman. This could be
an appeal to pathos, because working at a major fashion magazine may be a dream
for many, and this woman must make enough money to afford designer labels. Workers
at high-end fashion magazines are expected to dress a certain way, and the
employees are compelled to uphold the fashion industry standard. In Everything’s An Argument, Lunsford talks
about even something as simple as the clothes people choose to wear can be an
argument and express a view point (4). There is an appeal to logos when you see
the D&G label. D&G is a world-wide designer that is known to have a
high-end look, which would be a logical choice for someone working in the
fashion industry.
D&G
were one of the few brands that had explicit brand exposure within the film. Other
brands that were used had limited visibility and were harder to recognize. I
think that fact that this label was present benefitted the film’s story. However,
I do not think it was as positive for D&G. The fact that the character was
only willing to wear the shoes when needing to show off her credibility as a
fashion industry employee was damaging to the brand. D&G still maintains
their high-end title in this film, but takes a hit when it comes to a customer’s
loyalty and comfort. I give this product placement 2 tickets.
Ferla,
Ruth La. "The Duds Of 'The Devil Wears Prada'" The New York Times. The New York Times, 29 June 2006. Web. 28 Feb.
2013.
"Who
Is Dolce & Gabbana." Dolce &
Gabbana. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 Feb. 2013. <http://www.dolcegabbana.com/corporate/en/group/company.html>.
No comments:
Post a Comment